Artificial Intelligence (AI) Ethics Research
As artificial intelligence systems increasingly shape decisions in healthcare, hiring, criminal justice, education, and everyday communication, questions about how these systems should to be designed, deployed, and governed has risen to the forefront. AI ethics is a broad and still-evolving field that grapples with issues of bias and fairness, transparency and explainability, accountability when systems fail or cause harm, and the broad societal consequences of automating judgment at scale (such as labor displacement and the spread of misinformation). Because AI systems often operate as opaque "black boxes" whose decisions are difficult to interpret or contest, ethical inquiry in this space is closely intertwined with technical work on explainability, as well as with legal and policy frameworks attempting to assign responsibility and protect those affected. Many key questions remain unsettled even as AI systems become more powerful and more deeply embedded in institutions and daily life.
Some Useful Videos for Learning More About AI Ethics
AI Ethics Scholarly Resources
Ananny, M., & Crawford, K. (2018). Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. New Media & Society, 20(3), 973–989.
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 610–623.
Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468.
Diakopoulos, N. (2016). Accountability in algorithmic decision making. Communications of the ACM, 59(2), 56–62.
Gebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., Vaughan, J. W., Wallach, H., Daumé, H., III, & Crawford, K. (2021). Datasheets for datasets. Communications of the ACM, 64(12), 86–92.
Hugenholtz, P. B., & Quintais, J. P. (2021). Copyright and artificial creation: Does EU copyright law protect AI-assisted output? International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 52, 1190–1216.
Hughes, K. D., Konnikov, A., Denier, N., & Hu, Y. (2025). Problematizing the role of artificial intelligence in hiring and organizational inequalities: A multidisciplinary review. Human Relations, 79(2), 246–278.
Novelli, C., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2023). Accountability in artificial intelligence: What it is and how it works. AI & Society, 39, 1871–1882.
Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019). Dissecting racial bias in algorithmic healthcare tools. Science, 366(6464), 447–453.
O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction. Crown.
Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society. Harvard University Press.
Tsamados, A., Aggarwal, N., Cowls, J., Morley, J., Roberts, H., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2021). The ethics of algorithms: Key problems and solutions. AI and Society, 37, 215–230.
Zech, H. (2021). Liability for AI: Public policy considerations. ERA Forum, 22, 147–158.
Adadi, A., & Berrada, M. (2018). Peeking inside the black-box: A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). IEEE Access, 6, 52138–52160.
Barredo Arrieta, A., Tabik, S., García López, S., Molina Cabrera, D., Herrera Triguero, F., & Díaz Rodríguez, N. A. (2019). Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Information Fusion, 58, 82–115.
Burrell, J. (2016). How the machine "thinks": Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data & Society, 3(1).
Castelvecchi, D. (2016). Can we open the black box of AI? Nature News, 538(7623), 20–23.
Chmielinski, K., Newman, S., Kranzinger, C. N., Hind, M., Vaughan, J. W., Mitchell, M., ... Chang, A. (2024). The CLeAR documentation framework for AI transparency. Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy.
Cui, Y. L., Zeng, M. L., Du, X. K., & He, W. M. (2025). What shapes learners' trust in AI? A meta-analytic review of its antecedents and consequences. IEEE Access, 13, 164008–164025.
Felzmann, H., Fosch-Villaronga, E., Lutz, C., & Tamò-Larrieux, A. (2020). Towards transparency by design for artificial intelligence. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(6), 3333–3361.
Larsson, S., & Heintz, F. (2020). Transparency in artificial intelligence. Internet Policy Review, 9(2), 1–16.
Miller, T. (2019). Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences. Artificial Intelligence, 267, 1–38.
Peter, S., Riemer, K., & West, J. D. (2025). The benefits and dangers of anthropomorphic conversational agents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(22), Article e2415898122.
Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016). "Why should I trust you?": Explaining the predictions of any classifier. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1135–1144.
Ridley, M. (2022). Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): Adoption and advocacy. Information Technology and Libraries, 41(2), 1–17.
Abd-Elaal, E., Gamage, S., & Mills, J. E. (2022). Assisting academics to identify computer generated writing. European Journal of Engineering Education, 47(5), 725–745.
Chan, C. (2024). Students' perceptions of "AI-giarism": Investigating changes in understandings of academic misconduct. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 8087–8108.
King, M. R. (2023). A conversation on artificial intelligence, chatbots, and plagiarism in higher education. Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering.
Lund, B. D., Lee, T. H., Mannuru, N. R., & Arutla, N. (2025). AI and academic integrity: Exploring student perceptions and implications for higher education. Journal of Academic Ethics, 23(3), 1545–1565.
Perkins, M., & Roe, J. (2023). Decoding academic integrity policies: A corpus linguistics investigation of AI and other technological threats. Higher Education Policy.
Teel, Z. A., Wang, T., & Lund, B. (2023). ChatGPT conundrums: Probing plagiarism and parroting problems in higher education practices. College & Research Libraries News, 84(6), 205–208.
Tindle, R., Pozzebon, K., Willis, R., & Moustafa, A. (2023). Academic misconduct and generative artificial intelligence: University students' intentions, usage, and perceptions. PsyArXiv.
Zhang, L., Amos, C., & Pentina, I. (2024). Interplay of rationality and morality in using ChatGPT for academic misconduct. Behaviour and Information Technology, 44(3), 491–507.
Alexander, A. W. (2025). Data and AI mystification: Ownership, control, and financialization in the platform. Big Data & Society, early view.
Augenstein, I., Baldwin, T., Cha, M., Chakraborty, T., Ciampaglia, G. L., Corney, D., ... Zagni, G. (2024). Factuality challenges in the era of large language models and opportunities for fact-checking. Nature Machine Intelligence, 6(8), 852–863.
Barabas, C. (2023). Care as (re)capture: Data colonialism and race during times of crisis. New Media and Society, 26(12), 7351–7370.
Bubinger, H., & Dinneen, J. D. (2024). "What could go wrong?": An evaluation of ethical foresight analysis as a tool to identify problems of AI in libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 50, Article 102943.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2020). AI ethics. The MIT Press.
Gibson, J., Chapala, S., & Botchu, R. (2026). ChatGPT Health—Your "doctor" in your pocket, or is it? QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, early view.
Hancock, J. T., Naaman, M., & Levy, K. (2020). AI-mediated communication: Definition, research agenda, and ethical considerations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 89–100.
Jimenez, J. (2024, June). Can I opt out of Meta's AI scraping on Instagram and Facebook? Sort of. The New York Times.
Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1, 389–399.
Müller, V. C. (2021). Ethics of artificial intelligence and robotics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019). Energy and policy considerations for deep learning in NLP. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 57, 3645–3650.
Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2018). How AI can be a force for good. Science, 361(6404), 751–752.
Yu, X., & Shang, D. (2025). Research on online disinformation identification based on information characteristics and large language models. The Electronic Library, early view.
AI Ethics Research Guides
The SALAMANDER project is funded through the generous support of the Institute of
Museum and Library Services, Grant Number RE-259543-OLS-26.
This resource guide was created by Dr. Brady Lund and graduate assistant Bryan Anderson.
Last Updated September 25, 2026.